Full Proposals for International Polar Year 2007-2008 Activities
Proposed IPY Activity Details
1.0 PROPOSER INFORMATION
(Activity ID No: 190)
1.1 Title of Activity Survey of Living Conditions
in the Arctic, SLiCA - Remote Access Analysis System
1.2 Short Form Title of Proposed Activity SLiCA -
RAAS
1.3 Activity Leader Details Birger
Poppel Ilisimatusarfik, University of Greenland Greenland
1.4 Lead International Organisation(s) (if
applicable) Ilisimatusarfik, University of Greenland ISER,
Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Anchorage,
USA Université Laval, CEIRA, Canada
1.5 Other Countries involved in the
activity Russia Norway Sweden Finland
1.6 Expression of Intent ID #'s brought together in this
proposed activity 791
1.7 Location of Field Activities Arctic
1.8 Which IPY themes are addressed 1. Current state
of the environment 2. Change in the polar regions 3. Polar-global
linkages/tele-connections 4. Exploring new frontiers 5. The polar
regions as vantage points 6. The human dimension in polar
regions
1.9 What is the main IPY target addressed by this
activity 2. Data Management
2.0 SUMMARY OF THE ACTIVITY
Link
to SLiCA Data Description
SLiCA is an interdisciplinary and
international research project, which was founded in 1998. The two major
objectives are (1) to develop a new research design for measurement of
living conditions and individual well-being among the Inuit and Saami
peoples in the Arctic and the indigenous peoples of Chukotka reflecting
the welfare priorities of the indigenous peoples and (2) to carry out a
survey of living conditions among these peoples. The project is developed
in partnership with the indigenous peoples organisations. SLiCA has
accomplished the first objective and finished data collection in Canada,
Alaska, and Chukotka. By the end of 2006 data collection will be completed
also in Greenland, Norway, Sweden, Finland and the Kola Peninsula. The
data material will consist of approximately 15.000 personal
interviews.
In 2005 and 2006 SLiCA is focusing on achieving two
main objectives of the project – concluding analyses and publishing the
findings of the analyses. An additional main objective of the project is
to make the international data set available to the scientific and
indigenous communities of the Arctic as well as to political and
administrative decision makers at the local, regional, national and
international levels. The original project scope called for the
development of a micro data set that could be shared with these
communities. Our analyses to date have revealed a major challenge
associated with this approach. The protection of the confidentiality of
respondents requires collapsing of response categories for such variables
as location (e.g. place), occupation, and income. While we anticipated the
need for collapsing response categories, we did not anticipate the degree
to which this would pose a constraint for multivariate analyses. We
further realize that the challenge of providing analytically robust social
science data sets and protecting the confidentiality of respondents is
common in the Arctic social sciences. We therefore propose to contribute
to the IPY goal of expanding our understanding of human dimensions of
change in the Arctic by collaborating with an international team to apply
and extend the concepts of remote access analysis to the SLiCA
international database.
The objective of Remote Access Analysis is
to provide researchers with access to a micro data set for analysis (i.e.
the individual records of respondents to the SLiCA questionnaire) from
their own computers. This capability is particularly valuable in the
Arctic given the dispersed character of the scientific and indigenous
communities and local political and administrative authorities. We further
propose to extend this capability to work with restricted datasets where
the sensitivity of data is sufficiently high to warrant restriction of
access to the raw data. Researchers and indigenous organizations as well
as political and administrative authorities at different levels will be
able to conduct analyses while making it impossible to view the micro data
set itself.
To accomplish these objectives, the SLiCA international
team is collaborating with the Inter-University Consortium for Political
and Social Research (ICPSR) at the University of Michigan and the
Computer-assisted Survey Methods Program (CSM) at the University of
California, Berkeley.
Consistent with the IPY goal of fostering a
major step forward in our understanding of the human dimensions of change
in the Arctic, we propose to have the SLiCA Remote Access Analysis System
in place for the 2008 International Congress of Arctic Social Sciences,
ICASS VI (endorsed by the ICSU/WMO Joint Committee for the International
Polar Year 2007-2008 as an IPY activity), of the International Arctic
Social Sciences Association, IASSA. We will provide a demonstration of the
System and a training seminar in the use of the system at the
conference.
2.1 What is the evidence of inter-disciplinarity in this
activity? The SLiCA research group consists of researchers
from a variety of academic backgrounds e.g. anthropologists, geographers,
sociologists, economists, political scientists and will for the purpose of
implementing this project be expanded by experts in the field of database
construction and remote access to databases.
2.2 What will be the significant advances/developments from
this activity? What will be the major deliverables? What are the outputs
for your peers? The SLiCA international database contributes
to the IPY goal of expanding our understanding of human dimensions of
change in the Arctic by collaborating with an international team to apply
and extend the concepts of remote access analysis.
Focussing on
Living conditions in the Arctic, the SLiCA project highlights a variety of
questions, problems, concerns and attitudes combining the Inuit worldview
with the latest measurement and investigation
techniques.
Specifically the SLiCA project addresses the following
IPY themes and Questions: Theme # 1, Q: 2-3-4; Theme # 2, Q: 1-2-3; Theme
# 3, Q3; Theme # 4, Q: 3-6; and Theme # 6, Q: 1-2-4-6.
This effort
contributes to the requirement of the IPY-program for “a network of social
observatories, comparative case studies and databanks of social realities”
as well as meeting the requirements of “socio-economic surveys,
comparative studies and investigations of living conditions of the polar
residents…”
The major deliverable will be the SLiCA international
database linked to a Remote Access Analysis system.
2.3 Outline the geographical location(s) for the proposed field
work (approximate coordinates will be helpful if possible)
| Locations |
Coordindates |
| No locations or coordinates have been
added. |
2.4 Define the approximate timeframe(s) for proposed field
activities?
| Arctic Fieldwork time frame(s) |
Antarctic Fieldwork time frame(s) |
| |
MM/YY - MM/YY |
| |
MM/YY - MM/YY |
| |
MM/YY - MM/YY |
2.5 What major logistic support/facilities will be required for
this project?
Further details – Development of the concepts of
Remote Access Analysis to apply to restricted micro data sets such as
SLiCA will require close coordination between the countries making up the
international team and the experts in Remote Access Analysis. We
anticipate that this coordination will in large part be supported through
a web-based system that includes the Remote Access Analysis capability
itself, the sharing of results, and a mechanism for researcher
collaboration.
2.6 How will the required logistics be supplied? Have operators
been approached?
| Source of logistic support |
Likely potential sources |
Support agreed |
Consortium of national polar operators
|
|
|
| Own national polar operator |
|
|
| Another national polar operator |
|
|
| National agency |
|
|
| Military support |
|
|
| Commercial operator |
|
|
| Own support |
|
|
| Other |
|
|
2.7 If working in the Arctic regions, has there been contact
with local indigenous groups or relevant authorities regarding
access? Yes. The indigenous peoples participate in the SLiCA
project at both the regional and country level through representatives in
steering committees, advisory boards and through indigenous researchers
participating at all levels. At the national levels the responsibility of
data is either with university departments or national statistical
institutes.
3.0 STRUCTURE OF THE ACTIVITY
3.1 Origin of the activity This is a pulse of
activity during 2007-2009 within an existing programme
If part of an existing programme please name the
programme – Survey of Living Conditions in the Arctic, SLiCA
3.2 How will the activity be organised and managed? Describe
the proposed management structure and means for coordinating across the
cluster Geographically, SLiCA consists of 7 countries and 8
major regions (two in Russia). In each region there is one regional
co-ordinator. SLiCA´s international management board consists of these 8
co-ordinators plus SLiCA´s project chief. In each region there exists a
local research group and an advisory board consisting of representatives
from the indigenous population. Until now SLiCA´s international
co-ordination has been handled by Statistics Greenland. In the future
SLiCA´s secretariat is intended to be at Ilisimatusarfik/The University of
Greenland. This organisational structure will prevail in connection with
the implementation of SLiCA´s IPY project - including collaborators from
the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR)
at the University of Michigan and the Computer-assisted Survey Methods
Program (CSM) at the University of California, Berkeley. The international
management board will implement the conditions and procedures for
providing access to the database in coordination with the university
departments and statistical institutes.
3.3 Will the activity leave a legacy of infrastructure and if
so in what form? Yes. We understand that the infrastructure
developments required to support Remote Access Analysis on restricted data
sets can be applied to other Arctic (and non-Arctic) datasets.
The
Survey of Living Conditions in the Arctic has been designed to yield first
hand knowledge of the Arctic system as reported by representative samples
of Arctic indigenous residents. As such, SLiCA can serve as a cornerstone
of a Native Observation System in the Arctic.
3.4 Will the activity involve nations other than traditional
polar nations? How will this be addressed? No
3.5 Will this activity be linked with other IPY core
activities? If yes please specify *The activity has yet only
been linked with one other IPY core activity (#69), but as stated above
(see 3.3) the Remote Access Analysis System can be applied to other Arctic
datasets and the possibilities will be further explored. *The intention
is to co-operate with the COMAAR project primarily. * We will
furthermore provide a demonstration of the System and a training seminar
in the use of the system at the International Congress of Arctic Social
Sciences, ICASS VI (endorsed by the ICSU/WMO Joint Committee for the
International Polar Year 2007-2008 as an IPY activity - #69), of the
International Arctic Social Sciences Association, IASSA to be held in
IPY2007-2008.
3.6 How will the activity manage its data? Is there a viable
plan and which data management organisations/structures will be
involved? Our intent is to make the data available to all
researchers and indigenous organizations through an inter-linked set of
websites. The mission of the Inter-University Consortium for Political and
Social Research (ICPSR) at the University of Michigan is to archive and
make available for analysis social science data sets. We will work with
them to ensure that each participating country maintains full control of
its data and at the same time contributes to the international data
system.
3.7 Data Policy Agreement Will this
activity sign up to the IPY draft Data Policy (see
website) Yes
3.8 How will the activity contribute to developing the next
generation of polar scientists, logisticians,
etc.? Implementing the overall goals of the SLiCA - RAAS will
secure that data be managed in a way that information on the living
conditions of the indigenous peoples of a large part of the Arctic will be
accessible and work for both broad descriptive purposes and in depth
analyses. Hence the SLiCA data set can too be seen as a base line study in
relation to both quantitative and qualitative analyses within the social
sciences.
3.9 How will this activity address education, outreach and
communication issues outlined in the Framework
document? Development of the concepts of Remote Access
Analysis to apply to restricted micro data sets such as SLiCA is directly
aimed at facilitating education and research within a number of academic
disciplines related to living conditions research in the Arctic. Giving
access to SLiCA´s data and documenting SLiCA´s research design will be of
value for students, researchers, political and administrative authorities
and indigenous communities in the Arctic.
Consistent with the IPY
goal of fostering a major step forward in our understanding of the human
dimensions of change in the Arctic, we propose to have the SLiCA Remote
Access Analysis System in place for the 2008 International Congress of
Arctic Social Sciences, ICASS VI (endorsed by the ICSU/WMO Joint Committee
for the International Polar Year 2007-2008 as an IPY activity), of the
International Arctic Social Sciences Association, IASSA. We will provide a
demonstration of the System and a training seminar in the use of the
system at the conference.
3.10 What are the proposed sources of funding for this
activity? SLiCA will apply for funding for the activities
related to this proposal primarily from national funding agencies, e.g.
National Science Foundation, NSF and Social Science and Humanities
Research Council, SSHRS, as well as the Nordic Council of Ministers and
international research councils/funding agencies.
3.11 Additional Comments At the Arctic Council
ministerial meeting in Barrow, October 2000, SLiCA was accepted as a
member of The Sustainable Development Working Group under the Arctic
Council. At the Ministerial in Reykjavik, November 2004, this status was
confirmed and SLiCA was included in the Sustainable Development Action
Plan, 2004-2006.
In the summer of 2004 the Sustainable Development
Working Group of the Arctic Council proposed that SLiCA was backed up as
an IPY initiative.
4.0 CONSORTIUM INFORMATION
4.1 Contact Details
Lead Contact Mr Birger Poppel Ilisimatusarfik,
University of Greenland Box 279 Nuuk 3900 Greenland
Tel:
+299 324522/157 Mobile: +299 556266
Fax: +299
324711 Email: bipo@ilisimatusarfik.gl
Second Contact Prof Jack Kruse Institute of
Social and Economic Research, Aniversity of Alaska Anchorage 117 N.
Leverett Rd. Leverett MA 01054 USA
Tel:
+(413) 367 2240 Mobile: N/A
Fax: same
number Email: afjak@uaa.alaska.edu
4.2 Other significant consortium members and their
affiliation
| Name |
Organisation |
Country |
| Gerard Duhaime |
Université Laval, (CIÈRA) |
Canada |
| Larissa Abruitina |
RAIPON |
Russia |
| Jens-Ivar Neergård |
University of Tromsø |
Norway |
| Oleg Andreev |
Barents Centre of Social Research |
Russia |
| Hugh Beach |
University of Uppsala |
Sweden |
| Amy Pienta |
Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research
(ICPSR), the University of Michigan |
USA |
|