Slagelse, Denmark:
May 1998
The purpose of this work shop was to develop the conceptual design of an
international survey of living conditions in the Arctic.
The major decisions were:
DECISIONS FROM SLAGELSE, MAY 1998
Methodological decisions
·
A quantitative survey based on qualitative
studies
·
A comparative study based on a common survey
·
Survey data must be combined with regional
"system reports"
·
One core of common questions-additional with
regionally specific questions allowed
·
Three levels (a) inter-regional level, (b)
regional level and (c) community level (depending on local funding)
·
Geographical limitation: Inuit and Saami
living in the Arctic
·
Units of sampling: Inuit and Saami
households (1) random
individual + the most knowledgeable person regarding household production)
·
Units of analysis: Individuals and
households
·
Age 16+
Decisions regarding
indicators
7 objectives:
·
The research design must mirror the life
forms and welfare priorities of the respondents
·
The aim is not only to map living conditions
- but also to identify forces for social, economic and cultural change as well
as consequences of change
·
Theoretical and model deduced selection of
living conditions indicators (The household production model (a.o))
·
Coherent set of indicators. Measuring
Both descriptive as well as cumulative measures are
employed
Definition of Living Conditions
Living conditions are constituted by: individual control over resources that
can be employed in different arenas.
See: Slagelse Draft Proceedings Report